Why the
disconnect between thinking and feeling? Sojourning aliens
discern that just as the Abrahamics promoted the superiority
of the male, male energy and male spirituality, in like manner does
the Scientist/Scientismist quest for the superior "scientific"
state of emotionlessness. As Adam lived before Eve
was created from his rib—which we can simply assume was in a state
of emotionlessness since there was no other human being in the Garden!—so
the Scientist/Scientismist seeks such a male-only emotionality.
Since Earthfolk see the feminine
as the source energy for such core acts of engendering
human emotional health as embracing, holding in comfort,
and nurturing, what the Scientist and Scientismist
seek is—when looked at with sojourning alien eyes—quite
perplexing. But then it is understandable when the
connection with the Abrahamic state of emotionlessness is grasped.
Such a state of emotionlessness
is clearly a state of altered emotionality that manifests
itself in an altered state of consciousness.
It is a special state not every individual
can achieve—you must become a "trained scientist."
For scientific work to be accepted as scientific knowledge,
you have to demonstrate that you have learned the skill
of emotional detachment. To reach this goal, you are academically
trained and degreed. When expert at this skill, you are accepted by
your peers as a member of the "scientific community."
Notably, when,
as a scientist, you don the “white medical jacket”
or “lab coat,” this is a ritual
act recognized by your peers and others. It is an act of identification—you
become “Doctor” or “Professor”—and it
is assumed by observers that now you will follow a
professional and/or moral code. For medical
professionals, it is the Hippocratic oath.
For academic and research professors, it is the implied
oath of faithfulness to the scientific values of empiricism, rationalism
and reductionism.
Continue—Scientism
